Wikipedia sections do tend to last relatively longer :) - Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC) The thread was linked to in AN/I one sec and I'll have it here, Piotrus. CHAN DLER #10 - 03:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Summary of it would be nice for understanding the context of this section. Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.69.226.171 ( talk) 00:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Raul, I am afraid your link above is now 404.- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC) posts on /b/ does not last for 2 days. Jéské Couriano ( v^_^v) 20:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the clarification. Besides, administrators are going to be camping here all the day it's featured. Wikipedia is not censored for minors, mores, or twats. This is a serious issue, I believe: Wikipedia should not promote such a website. It seems that /b/ is planning both to 'invade' Wikipedia and spam 4chan boards with gore (extremely shocking) pictures. I think you may want to take it up to AN/I while there's still time, Raul. Raul654 ( talk) 07:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC) It is a good idea indeed, I watched closely this /b/ thread and even if there won't be any coordinated attack (/b/ is chaos as a concept), we will see this article edited unproperly or flooded with. In fact, it might be worth increasing it from semi to full protection. Just a note - given this, this article should absolutely not be unprotected while it's on the main page.

4chan deleted threads archive